Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 6:58:59 GMT
Lo Vuolo From various apparently antagonistic positions it is repeated that social spending should be directed to the poorest of the poor as long as they make personal efforts. However the same sectors do not focus on the richest or those who do not make greater efforts to obtain income.when thinking about the tax structure. and prevent a serious discussion about how to build more egalitarian societies in Latin America. pArguments for progressive tax reform in Latin Americap Latin American countries have very regressive tax systems and in general with low levels of collection in comparative terms. This is explained by the strong presence of taxes on consumption and salaries along with the low collection of taxes on peoples wealth and income.
This tax bias does not allow it to improve its recognized regressive distribution Russia Mobile Number List income and wealth the main problem of the region which gives rise to the unequal distribution of life opportunities that people have at birth. The importance of taxes in this result is often obscured because the distribution debate focuses on the distribution of wagesprofits and on the distribution and level of public spending. In fiscal matters most of the debates focus on the socalled social spending both in its level and in its allocation. Worse still the same discussion about social spending focuses on assistance programs despite the fact that they represent a low budget in total spending. These programs usually evaluate the need and merits of those who receive assistance transfers.
From various apparently antagonistic positions it is repeated that social spending should be directed to the poorest of the poor as long as they make personal efforts to deserve assistance. However this vision of focusing on the poorest and their merits which limits and hides important issues of social spending has no correlation when taxes are discussed. The taxes are not focused on the richest nor on those who do not make greater efforts to obtain income. For example low or no taxes are charged on financial income and inheritances legacies or donations despite the fact that they are received simply for being owners of capital and for being born in homes with resources without any merit or personal effort. Here the argument is different if taxes are imposed on these expressions of wealth the investment stimulus of these wealthy people will be affected so employment will not be developed for those who are forced to work to live.
This tax bias does not allow it to improve its recognized regressive distribution Russia Mobile Number List income and wealth the main problem of the region which gives rise to the unequal distribution of life opportunities that people have at birth. The importance of taxes in this result is often obscured because the distribution debate focuses on the distribution of wagesprofits and on the distribution and level of public spending. In fiscal matters most of the debates focus on the socalled social spending both in its level and in its allocation. Worse still the same discussion about social spending focuses on assistance programs despite the fact that they represent a low budget in total spending. These programs usually evaluate the need and merits of those who receive assistance transfers.
From various apparently antagonistic positions it is repeated that social spending should be directed to the poorest of the poor as long as they make personal efforts to deserve assistance. However this vision of focusing on the poorest and their merits which limits and hides important issues of social spending has no correlation when taxes are discussed. The taxes are not focused on the richest nor on those who do not make greater efforts to obtain income. For example low or no taxes are charged on financial income and inheritances legacies or donations despite the fact that they are received simply for being owners of capital and for being born in homes with resources without any merit or personal effort. Here the argument is different if taxes are imposed on these expressions of wealth the investment stimulus of these wealthy people will be affected so employment will not be developed for those who are forced to work to live.